|
|
|
|
|
by Incipient
1231 days ago
|
|
Take it to the extreme. If cf has a site hosting child exploitation content, that absolutely has to go - at the very least cf could potentially be liable for it. Taking it as a given that this is acceptable to block, then a line must be drawn somewhere at what does and does not get thrown off their network. So far cases of cf taking action have been very few and far between (in the grand scheme of things). |
|