[GalKlm]

Thanks again; glad to shed some light :)

I totally get you; we're struggling to find the correct wording. As an engineer, I also bump into the "gradual (temporal) rollout" as the first association of "Feature Flags".

What wording would make sense to you now that you understand the vision?

[satyrnein]

For me, it's that you described it as a LaunchDarkly competitor, which is mainly that "rollout" use case. It makes me expect the features they have, like alerts that a flag is serving the "launched" variation to everyone, and can be ripped out, or code search to see if any references to a flag remain.

I gather you're probably not doing that stuff?

That said, I have LaunchDarkly for feature rollout, an ACL layer for clients to control their own team's permissions, and then custom code to enable features based on a client's package plan. It feels like a lot of conceptual overlap, and a unified solution would be nice.

[nirga]

Yes that’s our long term goal. I don’t like having to adapt 4 different tools to do things which are quite similar.