They offer three families of resolvers: the default one which as far as I understand isn't curated at all, the "zero" one which is curated against "bad actors", and the "kids" one which you speak of.
Yeah, I see. On first reading, that wasn't obvious to me.
But a DNS provider that can filter, and that also purports to be something to do with the EU, presumably imposes EU-mandated filtering, whichever server you choose. Or it will, as soon as it's ordered to.
I don't get why people use 3rd-party resolvers. It's not hard to set up an Unbound recursor.
IMHO the only solution for real safety for children on internet are the parents that navigate with the child and education, any other solution is only a patch that give false security. And, above all, you're giving to other people the right to choose what is good or bad for your children. Not my way.
Yeah, I see. On first reading, that wasn't obvious to me.
But a DNS provider that can filter, and that also purports to be something to do with the EU, presumably imposes EU-mandated filtering, whichever server you choose. Or it will, as soon as it's ordered to.
I don't get why people use 3rd-party resolvers. It's not hard to set up an Unbound recursor.