|
|
|
|
|
|
by nullc
1233 days ago
|
|
|
> But if you click on that link you will not find the word "warranty" used in any way, and in fact the bases of the case seem not to involve any warranty-like responsibility at all. So I'm confused. It's helpful to read the trial court decision which was being appealed here: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2022/667.html The license is discussed at 110, with the judge concluding that it wasn't strong enough to be dispositive in isolation. |
|
|