[heleninboodler]

I think the answer is that they're not all equally challenging. My first kid is easy as pie. Still a lot of work, but generally does what's asked of her, has rarely thrown fits, is quiet, etc. The second kid is a constant battle.

[wonderwonder]

That's the nice thing about having multiple kids. The second kid situation is only 4 times harder than the single kid situation.

[giantg2]

A second kid is nice in theory. In practice it sounds like a nightmare.

[wonderwonder]

In the long run assuming the age gap is only a year or two it's actually beneficial. First couple years are very hard but after that they are friends and entertain each other. Sure they fight but when they are getting along and helping each other out it's peace on earth.

Schedule can get challenging. Kids are all pretty much great by the time they hit 8 years old. It's a bear to get there though.

Plus they are paired up at boxing so they get most of their resentment out there :)

[heleninboodler]

> Kids are all pretty much great by the time they hit 8 years old.

Having a rather tricky 10 year old, I think this magic number is a bit off.

[wonderwonder]

*results may vary. Not a guarantee of actual performance

:)

[giantg2]

Multiple family medical issues mean if I were to have another kid, there'd be more than 5 years of age gap. Then it means different friend groups, different sports/activities teams, etc. Then add in that one parent works evening hours... Scheduling hell.

[wonderwonder]

Yeah, that is a tough one; 5 years is trickier.

[heleninboodler]

And at most ONE YEAR where they actually go to the same school. Ugh.