|
|
|
|
|
by ElKrist
1231 days ago
|
|
I'm curious about your opinion on Git. It's actually a tool I'm excited to teach to non-developer people who deal with text documents and the need to keep a history, multiple versions etc. I'm aware that now these features are integrated in some common offices apps so there's less of a need for Git there. However what's wrong about Git for code? How would you cover the same features differently? When I say "Git" I refer to all the ecosystem that's based on Git, including GUIs for those who don't like the command line |
|
this whole branch and pr into merge process didn't exist 10 years ago like it does now. It started from open source and low trust - but nobody stopped to ask what problem it solves.
If somebody needs to check your code as part of a formal process - rather than some arbitrary invitation you issue in special cases - you shouldn't of been hired with the job of writing code.