[nl]

> These things can disable nukes according to testimony given to Congress.

Citation required.

> In the above situations, it'd be imperative for the US to acquire the tech through war, economic pressure or espionage, or if that wasn't possible try to prevent them manufacturing more.

Perhaps this is exactly what the US is doing? Except the US knows it can't go to war because it'd lose.

[nprateem]

This is the one that talks about UFOs disabling nukes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64njI0uNvGg

My mistake, the subjects offered to testify under oath to Congress (I'm not sure if they went on to do so, I think they may have but I can't find that video right now).

Regardless, this shows the phenomenon is over 50 years old according to credible witnesses, which makes the foreign adversary scenario unbelievable.

Check out Dr Greer's Disclosure Project.

This Nimitz incident needs to be viewed in the wider context of reports over the years, UFO images in art, and explanations in other sources e.g. the Mahabharata.

I was initially sceptical, but one can be too sceptical - all options need considering.

Putting it altogether, on the balance of probablilties I think aliens are in fact the only plausible explanation.

[likeabbas]

Robert Salas was the Air Force captain in charge of Nordstrom Air Force Base where he was witness to 10 isolated nuclear ICBMs becoming decommissioned with a UFO hovering above. He's testified to congress before but he's been asked to testify again https://twitter.com/keptycho/status/1608097197857595392?s=46...

There's a really good book "UFOs and Nukes" that goes into great details the correlation between UFO sightings by military members around nuclear facilities / detonation events.