[therealdrag0]

> They can be disbarred. Your AI can't.

Why not? That seems to be lacking imagination. There's all sorts of regulation that can be brought to bear.

> Yeah, because ChatGPT doesn't exhibit human behaviors, at all.

You can think so, but others disagree. Here is where the thread started.

> The more I work with LLMs, the more I think of them as plagiarization engines. > We're all kind of plagiariztion engines.

If you don't see any similarities others see, then further discussion is fruitless.

> ChatGPT doesn't exhibit human behaviors, at all.

Chat is a behavior humans do. It chats, and pretty damn well. Clearly you mean something else then what you are explicitly saying.