[hansihe]

We have no idea if images by Stable Diffusion violates copyright, there is no legal precedent.

[bioemerl]

Technically we do have examples of stable diffusion violating copyright, it will generate some exact clone images if you give it the right prompt and that image exists a few hundred times in the training data.

[yosame]

Just because stable diffusion can be used to violate copyright doesn't mean it only does.

[MacsHeadroom]

For something like 11 images which were accidentally repeated hundreds of times in the training data this is true. They're more the exception that proves the rule.