[AussieWog93]

It's dumb in the sense that it doesn't actually have a symbolic understand of what it's actually saying.

I use it quite frequently too, mostly for solving coding problems, but at the end of the day it's just regurgitating information that it read online.

If we took an adversarial approach and deliberately tried to feed it false information, it would have no way of knowing what's bullshit and what's legit, in the way that a human could figure out.

A lot of people who've never used ChatGPT make the mistake of thinking it has symbolic reasoning like a human does, because its language output is human too.

[visarga]

How many book mistakes have you found, as a human, so far? How about deliberate mistakes hidden in plain sight? I once re-validated for 3 times the same test set and was still finding mistakes.

[AussieWog93]

>How many book mistakes have you found, as a human, so far?

All the time. Probably every single day I read something and say "that's clearly bullshit".