|
|
|
|
|
by jeroenhd
1231 days ago
|
|
AMD did the same when they got an advantage through Ryzen. Intel quickly overtook them again and now they're back to being the underdog. Threadripper got killed off because it was starting to compete with AMD's own products, performance increases started to diminish, AMD very much took a short break when were at the top again. The only difference is that Intel managed to stay on top with their Core architecture for so incredibly long. That's not necessarily bad, of course. This behaviour has led to competition and competition is almost always good for the consumer. |
|
Given how well competition has worked for consumers, I do wonder if there’s some regulatory option here to reduce those back room deals. Given the way the world runs on microprocessors now there’s a decent argument that maintaining a robust market is like what we used to do to prevent one railroad or steel company from getting too much control.