|
|
|
|
|
|
by freejazz
1236 days ago
|
|
|
How are you going to tell if it accurately analyzed a legal document if you don't know how to accurately analyze a legal document? It's a tool that's being sold for jobs it shouldn't be doing, if that's the characterization that helps you understand the issue and not turn this into "blaming the tool for something it shouldn't be doing" |
|
|
There are plenty of pieces of the legal system that would benefit, today, from adding a well-made ChatGPT process. Perhaps not perfectly, in such a flawed system.
As an example, ChatGPT could assess the actions leading to a charge and compare the law to the actions of an individual.
Before you bash the idea, I happen to know of a case where ChatGPT outperformed the US Federal government in this analysis.
1 success is worth the cost.