|
|
|
|
|
by ushercakes
1225 days ago
|
|
Yeah, big time. It's faster, so crawlers give you better scores for page speed, which is important. Secondly, it automatically renders all of your content, vs if you dynamically load content, the crawler may just see a page with a "Loading" element and never actually view the content itself. Google argues that it is able to handle javascript heavy client side code in it's crawlers, but the data seems to show otherwise. |
|
It’s mentioned in other threads that SSR is more expensive as your scale - so you might as well make the “outside” layer of your site light weight and static/SSR for fast client loading and then give them the full SPA once they’ve clicked through your landing pages.