|
|
|
|
|
|
by bjhartin
1227 days ago
|
|
|
It seems to me the utility of the 'good' 50% depends entirely upon your ability to recognize it. How do you know when to dig through those obscure manuals? It seems to me that it'd be more useful when: a) I don't care whether the text says things which are not true Write me a poem about ... b) I care, and will have to verify it's results, but that cost is worth it Generate some test data ... I think we're at a very dangerous intersection between an apparent decline in American's ability to detect nonsense and an automated way to create convincing nonsense. |
|
|