|
|
|
|
|
|
by MichaelBurge
1236 days ago
|
|
|
> One of IGR's owners and the clinic's physicist were ordered to pay R$100,000 for the derelict condition of the building. Why were the owners liable? They notified the court and were prevented by the court from removing the machine, so my first thought is they should be blameless: The court assumed control and therefore responsibility. |
|
|