Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mrguyorama 1234 days ago
>And one time the plebs got one over on the financial class (the GME thing) they literally "shut it down".

That's not what happened. Robinhood (and a couple others) weren't prepared for a stock with no fundamentals to be bought by everyone, so they didn't have the collateral for it that was required.

3 comments

It wasn't as nefarious as it seemed at first, but the fact is the systems of investment currently in place do not allow for plebs to manipulate it in their favor. I was only an observer rooting for the common man, but I still have a difficult time seeing Robin Hood as a useful tool when they were not able to execute basic buying of an EFT on an open market.
"Your honor, my client didn't throw Joe out of the window, he merely defenestrated him at high velocity."

"Oh I see. That's totally different. Case dismissed."

How did they not have the collateral? The customers money is the collateral.