[onion2k]

I think it's an acquihire. They don't necessarily want Gatsby. They want the team who built Gatsby.

[reducesuffering]

I'm surprised this was the only other comment so far about it. It has to be an acquihire. Gatsby is a dead framework going forward.

[Alifatisk]

Why do you call it a dead framework?

[goodoldneon]

Why is it dead?

[reducesuffering]

Check the 5 year chart trajectory: https://npmtrends.com/gatsby-vs-next

and

https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=gatsby%2Cnext...

[LunaSea]

What are the alternatives?

[reducesuffering]

Next.js the comparison shown in those charts

[LunaSea]

I would not consider Next.js an alternative as it's missing a lot of the static website generation features.

I don't think that it has server side GraphQL and Typescript support with data preloading from headless CMSs.

[crummy]

Astro.build perhaps

[nsonha]

try it and you'll see, also have you heard the name Gatsby in the past 2 years? I think not.

[ferdowsi]

Strange time to do an acquihire given that Netlify just had a round of layoffs.

[bdcravens]

Just means Gatsby's talent is more desired than those they employed.