|
|
|
|
|
|
by still_grokking
1237 days ago
|
|
|
The claim was that Python is better suited to writing such libs and frameworks than other languages. You now say it's like that because Python has already quite some libs / frameworks in that direction. This looks like circular reasoning. Also the the "prototypical ML dude" comes form the math department. People with math background have a much easier time to grasp FP than procedural programming. FP is much more "natural" when you're used to math. (Procedural programming says things like `x = x + 1`, but even my grandma would know that "this has no solution", or is likewise "plain wrong" ;-)) |
|
|