[latexr]

> they should be allowed to comment (…) People are allowed to have discussions.

My comment doesn’t contradict that. On the contrary, I do think their particular experience adds value to the thread.

> it's not like the person is spamming the same message over and over again.

After reading the three comments multiple times, I disagree. The comments were (they’ve since been deleted) superficially different but none added to the conversation over the others. I would even say the repetition detracted from the point, since it made it seem like a personal gripe instead of a legitimate technical complaint.

[mynameisvlad]

You’re criticizing the fact that the person commented three times. While you’re not directly telling them “don’t do that”, you’re still admonishing someone for doing something well within the guidelines and even intentions of this site, to talk about things that are interesting to the user.

[latexr]

I have asked them to consider if the way they were going about the matter was appropriate. I have even explained to you what prompted it: I found their point valid and worthwhile, but in my view the repetition weakened their stance. Considering they deleted the extra comments a while back, perhaps they agree.

Respectfully, you seem unreasonably angry about this matter and I do not wish to continue a conversation where the other party keeps assuming the worst of my replies. There is no malice or ill intent in my post. If you see any, that is on you.

[mynameisvlad]

If you didn't want people to assume the worst, then maybe you should reconsider that how your write and what you say could be interpreted in many ways, and not sound so negative and admonishing when you criticize others?

Notice that I didn't tell you what to do, I simply asked you to consider if the way you were going about the matter was appropriate.