|
|
|
|
|
by foldr
1239 days ago
|
|
>In particular, when we do something like stitch multiple images together, we are making an assumption: the contents of the image have moved only in a predictable way in between frames From this way of looking at things a normal long exposure also imposes a prior assumption (that nothing is moving). It's just that we're used to the artefact that's generated when this prior isn't true (motion blur). |
|