|
|
|
|
|
by crabmusket
1239 days ago
|
|
> Most CRDTs aim to preserve causality: if I see your change, and then make my change, my new value will win. If we both make changes without knowing about each other, that's a conflict. I haven't kept track of CRDTs since I worked with them in ~2015 and having read the paper by Shapiro et al, but I thought a casual description would be more along the lines of "once we both receive each other's changes, we will agree on the final state"? Or does that no longer reflect current state of the art, or was I just mistaken at the time? |
|