|
|
|
|
|
by captn3m0
1233 days ago
|
|
Ubuntu makes this worse by using "end-of-life" dates as End-of-ESM at various pages[0,1]. If you read that page, you'll assume all packages will be supported till EOL for all users. This is all it says about ESM: > Extended Security Maintenance (ESM) provides security updates on Ubuntu LTS releases for additional 5 years. It is available with the Ubuntu Advantage subscription or a Free subscription. The Pro page[2], now has a clear graphic comparing the security coverage, but this appears to be new. [0]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases [1]: https://ubuntu.com/about/release-cycle [2]: https://ubuntu.com/pro |
|
The release cycle page (https://ubuntu.com/about/release-cycle) has no mention of any differences in updates for universe vs base packages.
The https://ubuntu.com/pro page says "best effort" for universe packages. Yet, they have an update for imagemagick, we just have to pay for the pro subscription to get it. How exactly is that "best effort"?