Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dragonwriter 1235 days ago
> The article skims over the details from the FCC, in this situation Twilio is guilty by association.

Its not “guilt by association”; Twilio has, under the relevant laws, a positive obligation to prevent illegal use of its platform on pain of disconnection.

1 comments

I think what the parent comment means by that is that Twilio itself is not robocalling people. Another company is using their services to do so.

The title could make it clearer, both interpretations could come from it.