[xeromal]

In the US, the military is actually used for combat operations so the risk of being injured or killed is higher than being "a shop owner, or carpenter or doctor or whatever". The majority aren't but you're still signing up for it when you join so you are given an amount of elevated respect. It's not something you sign up for willie nillie. You're obligated to serve for at least a tour (4 years I believe) and in those 4 years, you've lost every bit of free-will. It's a sacrifice that I wasn't willing to make so kudos to those who do.

[neoromantique]

As almost everywhere in the world.

Enrolling into military is a choice and you know risks beforehand, there’s nothing about that choice that deserves worship-like cult status military has in US.

[sicp-enjoyer]

And why do you think they take those risks? Do you think they would if people treated it like a job at mcdonalds? Would their families support them in being away for so long for 30k/year?

[quesera]

Some of them absolutely would, yes.

But psychologically, the drive to be a part of something important is very strong, especially in young men.

The military has a rich mythology that plays into, and perpetuates, this.

This is not bad or unhealthy! But it is also not inherently good. There are other groups which use the same tactics to recruit people for bad services. It very very much depends.

[sicp-enjoyer]

I completely agree, but I think that "rich mythology" you refer to is fueled by the public also believing in it to a great extent.

[quesera]

For certain. It's a symbiotic relationship.

But like any source of low-cost energy, some of it is diverted into unproductive things!

[Aeolun]

> In the US, the military is actually used for combat operations

This is true for most forces. All the US allies working in Iraq/Iran weren’t robots.