|
|
|
|
|
by goldfeld
1243 days ago
|
|
As for me, I don't think it's only that AI needs more training, but needs better trained users, or that we need to train at it to produce good results. I'm fast on becoming a pro-prompter and for that need to be trained on good requests. Anyone can dm me at /r/goldfeld and I'll take AI artwork commissions for real cheap, to train on real stuff. I think prompting may become a general skill superior in status to the early divide between those who could and could not use a PC/the web(which I lived through in the 90's). |
|
Google-fu was useful because there was consistent syntax and semantics that returned good search results. That's no longer the case, and that might have something to do with ML model integration with Google's search product.
I'm sure you could figure out a way to train models such that they share a common method/syntax to "summon" accurate answers from the ML oracles. I could see that being somewhat useful, but it looks like those that are commercializing AI products that interact with humans are looking for natural language interfaces, and not a specialized query grammar.