|
|
|
|
|
|
by vkou
1242 days ago
|
|
|
They didn't solve it by 90%, they lied with statistics, and compared exponential-growth forecasted counts with point-in time counts. The reduction was closer to 60%, and in the past few years, they've stopped investing in the program. It's been a good thing, but without ongoing effort and investment it will regress back to the mean. |
|
|