|
|
|
|
|
by wolverine876
1232 days ago
|
|
> You can't have a legal contract say an ambiguous statement then spend a literal decade promoting one interpretation then switch to another. OGL 1.0a isn't ambiguous; I didn't read anything ambiguous and I didn't see anyone point to ambiguity in it. Elsewhere, outside any license, they did promote another interpretation, but every IP attorney I read said that didn't matter. |
|