[tikhonj]

I really doubt Google would do this, not just because of potential contracts or even the lost revenue but mainly because of how tentative their market share is.

The only thing locking most people into Google search is habit. If Google were to not work for a day, a ton of people would start using Bing and friends; a significant proportion of these would indubitably continue using them forever. Most people don't really care about which engine they use--until it fails. Once it fails, they'll flail around for a bit then use somebody else.

I think the damage to Google's reputation and market share would be too big for them to consider killing search for a day. I could see them doing a doodle or something though.

[nestlequ1k]

I totally agree. Blacking out is just stupid. Raising awareness via splash page or messaging is effective and important.

Please, let's not be retarded. If things black out one day, it'll just piss people off and the next day it'll be back to normal.

Let's encourage Google / Facebook / Twitter to use their huge audiences to spread awareness of the issue. When the public hears what SOPA is, they will reject it. The only way this thing will pass is if its sneaks in by the special interests.

Stop the blackout talk though

[dvdhsu]

Please don't toss the word "retarded" around. Retards can't help being retarded. Using it as a synonym for "stupid" is crass.

It's no different from saying "SOPA is gay!!!"

[Shenglong]

Adjective: Less advanced, esp. mentally, than is usual for one's age. Synonyms: backward - delayed

Seems fine to me, especially considering it's no longer socially acceptable to use the word to describe the mentally disabled. Using gay however, is a completely different scenario. Retarded reflects on mental performance, while gay reflects on sexuality.

English already has so few words - we might as well use the ones we have.

[dvdhsu]

> Adjective: Less advanced, esp. mentally, than is usual for one's age. Synonyms: backward - delayed

The OP doesn't use it to mean "backwards" , "delayed" or "less advanced". He means "stupid" and should just say so.

> it's no longer socially acceptable to use the word to describe the mentally disabled

Looking on Wordnik [1], four dictionaries out of five list "retard" as having to do with mental retardation (Wordnet 3.0 actually doesn't mention it according to Wordnik, but a quick search reveals that it actually does [2]).

Wikipedia [3], in fact, argues that "mental retardation" is on a "euphemistic treadmill" [4]. I'll allow Wikipedia to take it away:

The terms mental retardation and mentally retarded were invented in the middle of the 20th century to replace the previous set of terms, which were deemed to have become offensive. By the end of the 20th century, these terms themselves have come to be widely seen as disparaging and politically incorrect and in need of replacement.

The term "mentally retarded" is no longer "socially acceptable", precisely because it perceived to be "disparaging".

> Using gay however, is a completely different scenario. Retarded reflects on mental performance, while gay reflects on sexuality.

People who are mentally disabled are unable to change it. As far as I know, the same applies to one's sexual orientation.

The OP uses the word "retarded" by saying "let's not be retarded". My state of retardation doesn't change from second to second; it's fixed at birth. Insulting what one can't change is the most powerful type of insult. If you call me "stupid", I can always work to be less ignorant. If you call me a "chink" because I'm Chinese, I can't change that, and I feel more insulted.

> English already has so few words - we might as well use the ones we have.

That's a horrible reason. Simply using the word "idiotic", "dense", or any other works just fine in the OP's sentence. None of those refer to immutable characteristics such as "gay", "retard", or "chink".

When communicating, there isn't any reason to use a potentially offensive word, especially when there are a plethora of less insulting ones available.

Edit: Changed "sexual preferences" to "sexual orientation". Thanks emmapersky!

-------------------------------------------

1. http://www.wordnik.com/words/retard

2. http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=retarded&su...

3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_retardation#cite_note-is...

4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euphemism_treadmill#Euphemism_t...

[VMG]

> When communicating, there isn't any reason to use a potentially offensive word

Unless you want to offend. You might want to offend to signal the intensity of your rage. Minor range can warrant words like idiotic or stupid, major range calls for words like "fucking retarded git"

> The OP uses the word "retarded" by saying "let's not be retarded". My state of retardation doesn't change from second to second; it's fixed at birth. Insulting what one can't change is the most powerful type of insult. If you call me "stupid", I can always work to be less ignorant. If you call me a "chink" because I'm Chinese, I can't change that, and I feel more insulted.

Unless you really are retarded, he clearly meant that you shouldn't behave like somebody who is mentally disabled, so I don't see the similarity to the word "chink".

[emmapersky]

> People who are mentally disabled are unable to change it. As far as I know, the same applies to one's sexual preferences.

Sorry, but I just had to point out the "Sexual Preference" implies choice, which, as you correctly point out is not something people choose. I think the phrase you were searching for was "Sexual Orientation"

[wimpycofounder]

I'm leery of people who have the time to write up walls of text like this.

[vnchr]

Great perspective on how to adjust the message. Seems that a blackout feels drastic enough to match the outrage we expect from these brands whom we identify with.

If Tumblr got 87k calls to congress, Google or FB or Twitter should generate an order of magnitude more with well placed banners and popups.