[abibibo]

>> 2) Perhaps a blackout will give some HNers the final push (and time) to make some phone calls to their representatives.

I think far more effective than a complete blackout would be requiring HNers contact their representatives before they can access HN content. Not sure how best to implement, but a email form that grants a token upon completion should be feasible (you'd need to decide how to handle non-US based IPs).

I have my doubts regarding the effectiveness of form emails on congresspeople, but I imagine those HNers who were going to call or write a more personal letter still will, with the added benefit of massive form emails from those less motivated to do so otherwise.

edit: grammar

[Sandman]

This is exactly what HN should not do. Making a statement by having the site down for a day is one thing (although I'm also opposed to that, and I voted no in the poll), but actively forcing your users to help some cause even though they may have completely different opinion is something else entirely. I, for one, wouldn't want to participate on such a website. HN should support free thinking, not suppress it. I, as well as probably 95% of people here, am against SOPA. But if, for some reason, some of the HN users are pro SOPA, we should respect the fact that they have a different opinion on the matter and not force them to accept our views, even if we strongly disagree with them.

If people want to write to their congressperson, they should do that of their own accord, not because they're being pushed into doing that to access HN content.

[wonderercat]

Ironically, the reason this won't work is the same reason SOPA won't: proxies. HN is one of the largest gatherings of hackers anywhere; give us a break.

That's in addition to the fact that it's consensus that emails aren't worth a damn here.

And also the fact that it would take significant wasted effort to implement.

If PG did something like this, I'd lose all respect.

[jezclaremurugan]

and what will people from other countries do?