[machina_ex_deus]

There are two arguments, and they like to confuse people that they must be related.

There is all the data of what is actually going on in the world. Temperature readings, satellite images, etc. This can be called science and it is evidence, but it doesn't come with anything saying what is causing it. The equivalent of a primitive man meticulously measuring the rain.

Then there is the conjecture that this is all because of CO2 and its all our fault. This is purely religious argument, not at all different than the good old "Gods are punishing us" argument from a primitive man. The only evidence for this argument are some trash computer models which are running far beyond their predictive capability.

It's also inevitable that if we have "global warming god" and "global cooling god", one would emerge victorious.

It isn't science, it's just masquerading as science. The data analysis of real world data is science. The trash computer models attributing all of this to CO2 aren't science.

These are similar to the computer models in the COVID crisis which have overshoot reality by orders of magnitude.