|
|
|
|
|
by john_the_writer
1237 days ago
|
|
It's a little bit like ruby.. But It's not object oriented, it's a functional language. It is polymorphic and all data is immutable. (Edit: actually realised its very much not like ruby, when I re-read this) What I've seen in most projects is that the awesomeness that is threading (tasks and processes) is not really used. Supervisors aren't built as first class citizens. I see teams eat the cost of NIH, but not get the benefits of crash fast, crash often. So yes it does end up looking/smelling like ruby/rails but it really really shouldn't. “A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing.” |
|