Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by encoderer 1239 days ago
In some ways, yes, but I think if you game it out, you see how the company loses in a number of ways. First, repetitional risk. Second, it’s likely that a liquidity provider would emerge who could offer, basically, to buy call options from individual holders for enough premium to cover the taxes due on exercise. (Stripe would not want an unaffiliated 3rd party accumulating a large position)
1 comments

Transfer and using them as collateral are typically prohibited explicitly in the agreement, so I'd be surprised if this could happen
Then call it a promisary note.