|
|
|
|
|
|
by ddevault
1247 days ago
|
|
|
Agreed. It's important to use the correct terminology. This does not qualify as open source and should be described as source available instead (or should switch to a license which is open source). I've written about this subject in detail here if you're curious about why this is important: https://drewdevault.com/2022/03/01/Open-source-is-defined-by... Happy to answer any more specific questions here on HN. |
|
|