[atonse]

Maybe. Maybe not.

We also have intuition. Where Something just seems fishy.

Not saying AI can’t handle that. But I assure you that a human would’ve identified a moving cardboard box as suspicious without being told it’s suspicious.

It sounds like this AI was trained more on a whitelist “here are all the possibilities of what marines look like when moving” rather than a black list which is way harder “here are all the things that aren’t suspicious, like what should be an inanimate object changing locations”

[burnished]

Whats special about intuition? Think you could rig up a similar system when your prediction confidence is low.

[woodson]

Part of the problem is that the confidence for “cardboard box” was probably quite high. It’s hard to properly calibrate confidence (speaking from experience, speech recognition is often confidently wrong).

[atonse]

Totally.

But it seems like all these ML models are great at image recognition but not behavior recognition.

What’s the state of the art with that currently?

[burnished]

Last I knew "absolute, complete garbage"

[arminiusreturns]

The quantum entanglement of our brains with the world around us.

[burnished]

I am having a hard time understanding what this is supposed to mean, can you be more explicit about the cause/effect here?

[arminiusreturns]

I think there are strong indicators in much neuroscience research that indicate our brains are quantum entangled in a way that a cpu currently is not. I project the quantum entanglement part from the experiments such as the precognitive ones, which usually don't make that claim.