|
|
|
|
|
by afunctionof
1238 days ago
|
|
This is untrue for some definitions of "world." For me, "world" can consist of a few things. "World" can mean your immediate environment. Plenty of people can claim their death would not be "OK" for those in their immediate environment. "World" can consist of your society at a regional or national level. Again, plenty of people can claim their death would be harmful at this level. Look at the Huey Long assassination, or the spike in suicide rates after Robin Williams ending himself due to dementia. "World" can consist of all the people in the world. If Stanislav Petrov died prior to him preventing the end of (most of) the world, this level of the "world" would not be OK. If Gates had died decades ago, millions more each year would be dying of malaria. His death would leave the "world" "not OK." "The world will always be okay" as a mindset is only true if your idea of the world is the rock itself. I find it hard to care about the rock itself. |
|