[notch656c]

Yes it ensures I will never watch the show again because I find their presumptuous morals repulsive. The aggregate effect I suppose will definitely have an effect on the brand. IMO they trashed their brand by sacking people before they were found guilty.

God bless the right to bankrupt yourself to mete out preliminary justice, though.

[jjulius]

>IMO they trashed their brand by sacking people before they were found guilty.

To be fair, AS simply said they've ended their relationship with Roiland without saying why. Are you not also doing the same thing to AS here that you're accusing them of doing to Roiland (eg, making a proof-less accusation and terminating your relationship with the show because of it)?

[notch656c]

>making a proof-less accusation and terminating your relationship with the show because of it)?

Lol publicly firing someone in what is obviously tied to criminal accusations is the same as not watching a show? That's like saying preferring to date latina women is the same thing as being racist in your hiring process.

[jjulius]

>Lol publicly firing someone in what is obviously tied to criminal accusations is the same as not watching a show?

You can use the same reason to not take part in two things that might be wholly separate.

[notch656c]

Let's say there is a freckled girl in front of me.

I could do all the following

1) See freckles

2) Find it attractive

3) Fire them

4) Convince others freckles are evil and all freckled people need executed

5) Not watch their show because I don't like freckles

Yeah the reasoning the same; I did it because the freckles. Therefore basically I did the same thing.

Brilliant jjulius. And this is all ignoring I'm not even making any criminal presumptions against Rick and Morty or my reputation in connection with associating with someone criminally charged. So really neither my reasoning nor the act is the same.

[jjulius]

Woosh.