|
|
|
|
|
|
by arethuza
5276 days ago
|
|
|
I read that a long long time ago - but I'll have a think and see if I can recall where it was. I'd agree that a larger team effectively mitigates risks around individuals not fitting in or decision-making being stymied, but in my own personal experience I've definitely preferred, due to a perception of maximising by own personal productivity, that 3 or 4 was best. That is, of course, completely subjective! |
|
|
However, here is a more recent article that suggests that "best" team size is 5 plus or minus 2 - which fits into my preferred range:
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1674234&...