|
|
|
|
|
by jwallaceparker
5272 days ago
|
|
>> Ethics aside, it's also bad strategy, and just won't work. If you're obligated to give up your car before writing about global warming, or obligated to become a vegan before writing about animal cruelty, or obligated to take monastic vows before writing about conflict in domestic relationships -- then you'll probably never write about any of these issues. And that won't help anybody, will it? I find Moglen's absolutist point of view on this issue refreshing. You're not obligated to give up your car or go vegan to write about certain issues, but you're a hypocrite if you don't acknowledge your own contribution to a problem. Two examples: Al Gore did a great job spreading the word about global warming, but he still has a larger carbon footprint than most Americans (it's well-documented). Jonathan Safran Foer became vegan when he researched and wrote his book "Eating Animals" about animal cruelty. We need more people like Foer, do we not? |
|
That's like saying that everyone at Occupy Wall Street had forswear all material goods in order to be considered "valid" protesters.
Discarding someone's argument due to a lack of complete purity is just plain facile.