|
|
|
|
|
by moyix
1244 days ago
|
|
When it gets it entirely wrong that will be trivially detected by an I/O example, no? So I don't see that as dangerous, just inconvenient (it sometimes doesn't work, but you know when it doesn't work). You can also use an existing semantics-preserving deobfuscator and then use that as the input to an LLM deobfuscator instead of the original. If you're saying that obfuscators can eventually adapt, then sure. So can deobfuscators. This particular problem is kind of inherently an arms race. |
|