Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bobkazamakis 1235 days ago
That's not generally a good enough indicator; plenty of obfuscation involves loops that otherwise aren't hit.
1 comments

Yeah, pretty sure that loop is to modify the lookup table for strings in runtime so you can't just statically replace it in the code, it's not strong obfuscation but in a properly deobfuscated code that loop wouldn't exist