[_a_a_a_]

What new evidence.

The guy's post said it was checked by linguists and found inadequate to support your claim. Not that your claim is wrong, just unsupportable by that checking.

[moloch-hai]

Are you aware of the article your post is attached to?

[_a_a_a_]

Yes. Iust can't see the word 'semitic' or 'carthage' there, am I missing something?

[moloch-hai]

It is new evidence. Previous conclusions formed in its absence are obsolete. The new conclusion might be the same, or not, but not without checking first.

[_a_a_a_]

What explicitly is the link. What is the new evidence. Please be specific.

[moloch-hai]

It is right there at the top of the window you are looking at right now. They call it TFA around here.