[Loughla]

I agree with the less privileged folks getting shafted statement, but for the rest:

I am 100% unwilling to use my debit card for any purchases.

Why?

Fraud. If I pay with cash, then fraud amounts to getting actually robbed. Identity theft and account compromising is literally impossible. If I pay with credit, it is MASSIVELY simple to get that fixed, and it becomes the cc company's problem.

With a debit card, any issues immediately become my issue, because the money is out of my account in that moment. Not good.

[runnerup]

> If I pay with cash, then fraud amounts to getting actually robbed.

Getting robbed cash in your wallet you are 100% out of the money. But fraud on a debit card must be made whole by the bank within 30-60 days per “Regulation E”, which offers similar protections to debit cards that credit cards receive under “Regulation Z”

[scarface74]

And using a credit card the money never comes out of my account.

[wombat_trouble]

This is a popular take, but I found relatively little difference in how my bank handles CC and debit card fraud. In both cases, they credited the disputed amount to me right away.

Not that it buys you much; there's plenty of small / specialty merchants who might offer you a discount for paying with cash or check, but they treat credit and debit the same.

[jjav]

> This is a popular take, but I found relatively little difference in how my bank handles CC and debit card fraud. In both cases, they credited the disputed amount to me right away.

There is indeed usually not much difference in how banks handle the fraud on credit cards and debit cards.

But it is vital to understand that with credit cards, you are off the hook on fraud due to regulations (in the USA, don't know other countries laws). With debit cards, you're probably off the hook on fraud only because the bank wants to be nice in the name of customer service (usually and only up to a point).

So with debit card fraud the bank might decide they don't really want to keep you as a customer and things become your problem. With a credit card it'll never be your problem because the regulations make it so.

[lxgr]

> with credit cards, you are off the hook on fraud due to regulations

If your issuer contractually offers zero liability for debit fraud, that is just as binding as regulations – and most do.

And if they don't, from a regulatory point of view, the liability for debit cards is limited to $500 when reported within 60 days of receiving your statement, compared to $50 for credit cards: Certainly a difference, but definitely not as drastic as "you're always on the hook" vs. "never your problem" as it is often characterized.

> So with debit card fraud the bank might decide they don't really want to keep you as a customer and things become your problem. With a credit card it'll never be your problem because the regulations make it so.

The regulations say nothing about the issuer having to keep you as a customer going forward. I highly doubt that, given reoccurring fraud cases even after a couple of card/number replacements, credit card issuers would be keeping you as a customer any more than debit issuers.

[jjav]

> If your issuer contractually offers zero liability for debit fraud, that is just as binding as regulations – and most do.

Every bank card or account I've ever had regularly send out notices saying they have changed their terms of service and your continued use of the account indicates your agreement to the new terms.

In other words they can change those any time they want unilaterally and you probably won't even notice (because who reads those terms of service?)

You may also want to read all the fine print to see if they carve themselves any exceptions.

The great benefit of the protections under credit card regulations is not having to worry about any such shenanigans. The bank can't change the regulation so you know you're always protected, full stop.

Also remember that fraud on a debit card hits your account balance immediately, even if you can later argue to have it credited. Fraud on a credit card simply hits the credit card and can't touch your real money. Think of a credit card as cloudflare layer for your bank account agains fraud DoS.

I'm always very puzzled as why in the US one would ever use a debit card (I say US because I'm not familiar with regulations in other countries). A credit card offers stronger protections, stronger account isolation and cash back rewards.

[lxgr]

> [...] fraud on a debit card hits your account balance immediately, even if you can later argue to have it credited. Fraud on a credit card simply hits the credit card and can't touch your real money.

It can touch your real credit score (if not resolved in your favor), which directly correlates with your ability to continue using credit cards.

And either way, you lose liquidity until the provisional credit (which is very soon in both scenarios, also required by law!), although admittedly money in a checking account is slightly more liquid since you can pay rent and cash-only expenses with it without incurring interest changes.

> I'm always very puzzled as why in the US one would ever use a debit card

Many people don't have credit, don't feel comfortable with the possibility of having to pay absurd interest rates in case they can't make a payment, or a combination thereof.

[jjav]

> It can touch your real credit score (if not resolved in your favor), which directly correlates with your ability to continue using credit cards.

The topic of this thread is real fraud (as opposed to someone claiming fraud on a charge they actually made). So, it will always be resolved in your favor, that's my point here. Regulations on credit cards mean it will always be resolved in your favor (assuming actual fraud). So, no, it won't impact your credit score.

[_ktx2]

On my credit card I've reported fraud and been reimbursed immediately. On my debit card there's a lot more hassle. I can stop a transaction and I can report the fraud, but it takes a long time to resolve (usually weeks). They're two different systems entirely. For instance, I signed up for a single month of the LA Times as part of a charity drive. They continued billing me for over a year which is clearly fraud. The best I could do was stop the transaction that month and I'd have to contact them for reimbursement before my bank would step in. Basically, "try to do business with the fraudsters first, if they refuse we might help."

[hateful]

For me it's this, plus it's not ADHD friendly.

It acts as a capacitor/battery for my money. My spending fluctuates, but my income is steady.