[CuriouslyC]

Trying to legislate model training is impossible and stupid. At worst some copyright holders will sue a company because a model is biased and produces close-enough replicas of something under copyright. Model builders will respond by penalizing models that reproduce copyright images too closely, and better curating data sets to avoid bias, at which point the issue will be moot.

[Taywee]

I don't want anybody to feed any of my work into a model at all without following all the terms of the licenses of my work. If my work is used to generate, via a computer program, a derived output, then you need to follow my licenses.

People keep pretending that AI is the exact same thing as a human learning, but it's really a lot more like a fancy compiler with highly non-deterministic output. AI is not a human.

[CuriouslyC]

I wouldn't be surprised if these large language models have an interior life that is more rich than many humans I've met who barely seem cognizant of their surroundings.

[jimbo9991]

I agree with you but would take it a step further as an AI hater.