[ethbr0]

>> But as a manager of remote, distributed, international teams?

> You can’t win horse races with pack mules, my dad (a basketball coach) used to say.

You can boil it down to saying that Scrum is either (a) micromanagement or (b) an admission that your developers and their managers suck.

Fix the problem, instead of slapping a bureaucratic band-aid on that's going to attrit any remaining quality developers.

[trentnix]

> Fix the problem, instead of slapping a bureaucratic band-aid on that's going to attrit any remaining quality developers.

I don’t think this is right. It’s like a sports team: your system, your philosophy, your approach matters. Like in basketball, you might utilize the flex motion offense or you might use the Tex Winters’ triangle.

Good teams can succeed with both, but depending on your personnel and what you’re up against, you might find one strategy works better than the others.

[ethbr0]

Good teams can succeed with both, but it's billed as a panacea for bad teams.

[eric-hu]

Do you realize you’re attacking a straw man? Has anyone in this thread said that Agile is a panacea? I think we can agree it is not, nor is anything a panacea.

[ethbr0]

The response was re: sanedigital's remark that it was a good way to minimally fix (implied) bad teams.

And I've seen it used exactly that way in practice at bad companies.

It's not a strawman if it's lived experience and professed corporate IT strategy at a lot of non-tech companies.