|
|
|
|
|
by spritefs
1240 days ago
|
|
> Also: arguments like this (which tend to be extremely persuasive, and often account for a non-trivial amount of arguments) could be easily eliminated with a simple rule. I wasn't really trying to make an argument, it's more of a heuristic if anything > How do you account for... > a) the unknown? just do whatever habit says to do (and don't call it the truth) > b) the known delusional nature of the mind? this is a fun one. give the delusional mind a pen, paper, and 20 years and maybe they'll write the next phenomenology of spirit and trigger world war III |
|
On certain topics, it seems people are not able to do that, as simple as it sounds. (Not a hit at you, more of a general observation.)