[stmball]

> If I were running a university, I'd definitely move the large early undergrad courses to MOOCs to free up lecturers time for more advanced/specialised courses and direct supervision of students. It seems crazy to me that there are thousands of basic algorithms, calculus, etc courses being taught across the world by people who could use their time a lot more productively teaching the more specialised knowledge they have acquired through their research.

Universities are in a position where they have to balance teaching quality with research output, and there's a tremendous amount of pressure for (I would say!) the majority of universities around student experience that I think is underplayed in this thinking. In my experience MOOCs are not a substitute for in-person teaching, and the move to this kind of content delivery during COVID was met with pretty universal student dissatisfaction, both from students and lecturers.

I think a more appropriate approach is for there to be more clearly defined system for teaching/researching - i.e. post-doctoral staff who have mainly teaching responsibilities and others who are mainly research based. This win-win is already the case in a number of institutions and departments I know, however I know a lot of staff on both sides who would like total separation if desired. It's not a positive student experience to have lecturers who openly do not want to be there!