|
|
|
|
|
by HarHarVeryFunny
1253 days ago
|
|
The latter. The robot is able to balance by itself during complex dynamic movements, has it's own vision system to know where to plan to put its feet, etc. What it doesn't have is any intelligence - it's not making any high level decisions, only these type of low level foot/limb placement/movement and balance decisions necessary to execute the sequence of moves it has been choreographed to execute. Maybe not so much different than an accomplished ballet dancer faithfully executing a choreographed dance - the overall plan is fixed (even if the dancer could change it), but there's still considerable skills needed to execute the sequence! I believe there's a difference between different Boston Dynamics robots in terms of degree of autonomy though - how high level the "choreographed" instructions can be. Their "Spot" dog-like robot seems more capable in this regard than the humanoid "Atlas", despite Atlas being much more impressive in terms of dynamic balance etc. |
|
Adding “dumb” intelligence on top is not too hard. (Of course, the holy grail would be AGI on top)