[BoorishBears]

I think you're either misrepresenting reality or stretching the truth.

For example, if you're redefining bug as "bug that made it past testing" that's one thing.

But I don't buy anyone writing Python daily for 15 years hasn't seen the term "TypeError" which is what your previous two comments were implying.

[mianos]

OK, it's 100% likely I saw it, just so rarely I can't remember.

Testing. Over that long time I have used many test frameworks. My normal workflow is to try and exercise all the code I write as I go.

On the other hand I am 100% pedantic about using 'schema' (https://pypi.org/project/schema/) to validate all the types, structure and domains when I read json.

[mharig]

Nearly the same here. The only type error I make a little bit more than I would like, is expecting an iterable and passing a string instead, because I forgot parentheses around arguments.

But I made way more type errors when programming in C/++.

Why do you prefer schema to (fast)jsonschema?

[mianos]

'schema' is more a schema enhanced by python than just a checker. It can convert types, set defaults so after 'Box' I can simple access config with a.b.c. It may be subtle but it is much more powerful than it looks.

There are many of these things. Maybe some are better but I like this one.