[Kim_Bruning]

I think it depends on the type of bike and how you ride it. As far as I'm aware most dutch people consider riding a "normal"[1] dutch bike to be inherently safe.

If you're riding a fast racing bike or a mountain bike, you're probably engaged in slightly more risky activity, and people do wear helmets on those bikes.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aESqrP3hfi8

[latchkey]

Quick turn, front wheel slips out, head on the ground.

Bike rides off the side of the road, fall over, hit head on a rock.

Run head on into a pole.

Certainly, the style of bike helps and those are safer bikes... they don't prevent head trauma though. A helmet does.

This is also similar with skiing. I learned to ski when I was a kid and never wore a helmet. People wear helmets now. Even on bunny slopes. Kids wear them too. You're on snow, it is soft. Helmets are still a good idea.

It is the accidents you're not expecting that tend to hurt you the most.

[Kim_Bruning]

At some point, after taking all the other measures, adding a helmet on top of all that just seems like overkill to many people in the Netherlands.

But I understand why you might feel different. I do hope you agree that the other measures should be taken too.

Just so long as it doesn't end with people thinking that just wearing a helmet makes everything ok. It's not ok if bicycle riders and pedestrians still get run over on a regular basis.

[ (edit) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3-o5naTPT4 <- interviews of some dutch people on why they don't wear helmets. Views are varied, of course! ]

[latchkey]

https://road.cc/content/news/dutch-neurologists-call-cyclist...

If anything, learn to set a good example for others. To me, it seems absurd to think that anyone would go so far as building nice roads for bikes, which sets a great example, and then stopping short at protecting your noggin with a piece of foam.

I'm not for mandates that people must wear them, it just seems like basic common sense to me. If people don't want to use their sense, or just take the risk on their own, sure... whatever.

[Kim_Bruning]

I've seen that link before! The public debate in the Netherlands is continuous and ongoing.

The surgeons mention children and e-bikers being the most at-risk categories.

If you look at the interviews I linked, you'll see 2 different e-bikers there having a semi-split of opinion, the gentleman was already wearing a helmet (because it was a fast e-bike) , while the lady wasn't wearing a helmet yet, but was considering getting one (because she felt her [new?] e-bike was too fast and thus more dangerous).

I also posted a video elsewhere here where you actually see some of the children indeed wearing helmets. In the interviews I think one of the people was of the opinion that beginner/inexperienced cyclists could definitely wear helmets more often.

On the other hand, you see that people on slow city bikes think that a helmet there is probably the wrong call. eg. "On one of these bikes, if you fall you are more likely to bang your hip" (this is also my own experience on city bikes tbqh). Other bikes are certainly different.

But this is all arguing over details I think. The most important take home message is that it is a wise investment to bolster your infrastructure and make the roads safer for bikes. (Or better yet to make them safer for everyone, not just bikes)