[smeej]

I disagree. I find it easy to tell the difference between chatGPT responses in conversations and human interactions. It does mimic humans, but in a stilted way that's specific and consistent.

I'm not sure if this could be connected to the way I learned to understand human behavior, by extensive deliberate pattern-matching with my organic intelligence. I was led to believe I had no hope of understanding people intuitively, so I should study the patterns in how humans interact and learn to mimic them as well as possible.

That made it easy to see who was reacting intuitively (i.e., acting like a human naturally) and who was doing what I was doing (i.e., "running 'human' in emulation mode," as Elon described having Asperger's).

From my vantage point, chatGPT is clearly and obviously not reacting like a human, which does make it feel uncanny to watch it try.